All manuscripts submitted to IDEIS JOURNAL go through the following three-stage evaluation process:

​

1. First Review (Evaluation)

After the article is submitted, the first check is carried out by the Editorial Board.

At this stage, the following criteria are analysed:

Compliance with journal publication scope

Compliance with spelling rules and formal requirements

Plagiarism rate (85% originality requirement)

Ethical compliance (ethics committee certificate if required)

Editorial conclusion:

Eligible manuscripts are forwarded for peer review.

Unsuitable articles are returned to the author with a reasoned explanation.

 

2. 2nd Referee Evaluation (Double Blind Refereeing)

Manuscripts that pass the first review are sent to at least two referees who are experts in their field by double-blind peer review method.

Author and referee identities are kept confidential.

The referees evaluate under the following headings:

Scientific originality and contribution

Relevance of the subject to the field

Methodological robustness

Adequacy and accuracy of sources

Quality of language and expression

Arbitral Awards:

Suitable for publication

Suitable with minor corrections

Should be re-evaluated after major corrections

Not suitable for publication

 

3. Feedback and Correction Process

As a result of the referee evaluations, a reasoned feedback is sent to the author.

The author is asked to make corrections and submit the revised manuscript within a certain period of time (usually 2-4 weeks).

The author re-uploads the file with a "Response to Reviewers" explaining the changes made.

After revision:

Minor corrections can be checked directly by the Editorial Board and a decision on publication can be made.

Major corrections may be resubmitted for peer review.

 

Conclusion:

Accepted articles are prepared for publication in the next issue.

Rejected articles are notified of the decision with a reasoned explanation.